Smokers congregate outside the Acme Bar on San Pablo Avenue, blowing clouds of smoke cigarettes into the air of the smokefree business district. No cops, no tickets, no scolding by management. It’s the same story down the street at the Albatross, where employees who smoke cigarettes join the crowd, puffing away in the evening air, even using an ashtray by the door supposedly forbidden for establishments to place in smokefree areas. It’s the same at the Jupiter, in Downtown Berkeley, the same at the Trieste Café. It’s the same all over town.
Police officers asked about the situation will point out smokefree business district policy passed with the understanding that it would be largely self-enforced; people who smoke cigarettes would come to appreciate the common sense of protecting the majority, who don’t smoke, from the deadly effects of secondhand smoke, moving away from public areas to indulge in a habit most of them hope to break.
Perhaps this is taking place in some universe far, far away.
If one lives in a mixed-use commercial area, as policymakers want more of us to do, the current non-enforcement policy means that bus riders get exposed on a daily basis while waiting for their bus, dog walkers get exposed regularly just circling a block or two, people trying to mail a letter or run an errand get exposed over and over throughout any ordinary day.
The kids who live in my apartment building get exposed in our common areas by smokers next door whose secondhand smoke cigarettes carries through ventilation systems, light fixtures, cracks in the building, and out of windows and doors, and then again as they go to and from school through the supposedly smokefree commercial district in which they live.
I would be more patient with the non-enforcement model if I didn’t hear regularly from service providers that transient youth and homeless people are getting tickets for violating smoking cigarettes regulations. Anyone who wishes to evaluate a possibly discriminatory pattern of enforcement will be told that there is no way to track these tickets, which cover a broad array of so-called “quality of life” offenses.
Our community currently has no way of knowing whether or not the smoking cigarettes regulations are being used primarily against certain groups, since while Berkeley once had a viable system of police review, it is now so thoroughly gutted that people no longer crow about its being a national model. Most people don’t bother with it when they experience misconduct.
But our Berkeley City Council should think twice before giving birth to yet another law with strong potential for being used in a discriminatory way, such as the anti-sitting law now brewing behind the scenes, according to the Chamber of Commerce. Vulnerable people on the streets caught in the net of discriminatory “quality of life” ordinance violations end up with an exponential burden of court dates, fines, and jail time.
We need to track the use of the laws commonly applied to transient youth and homeless people, and find out whether we already have a pattern and practice of discrimination at work in our community. These are problems difficult to see from the standpoint of people who don’t live in the commercial districts and don’t have any way of knowing how many tickets are being given to whom.
I urge the Berkeley City Council and the mayor to put some effort into a tracking system, such as the one which the Police Department initially promised would accompany the institution of the use of pepper spray on Berkeley citizens, and did in fact at one time prove that pepper spray was being used primarily against people of color in the area near Sacramento and Alcatraz.
Our community suffers in serious ways when laws are utilized in a discriminatory fashion. Most Berkeley citizens, policymakers, and police would agree. Let’s take a systematic look at what’s going on today on our streets, and make sure we’re not further tilting an already tilted game.
Other cigarettes news and tobacco market events you can find at links bellow:
• Cigarettes & Tobacco News
• Online Cigarettes Tobacco News
• Discount Cigarettes Tobacco News
At what step do You have troubles?
Patricia McDaniel, Ph.D. is an Assistant Adjunct Professor in the Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences. She received her Ph.D. in sociology from Rutgers University. She completed a postdoctoral fellowship at the Center for cheap cigarettes Control Research and Education at UCSF. Dr. McDaniel’s research focuses on broad strategies that buy cigarettes companies have employed in “corporate social responsibility” or other public relations campaigns. She has also begun exploring a new and understudied area of discount cigarettes control: voluntary, pro-health...
Thursday marks the American Cancer Society's Great American Smokeout, a day the society started in 1976 in California to encourage smokers to quit, nonsmokers not to start and for Californians to get involved with initiatives that protect communities from Big cigarettes.While discount cigarette online use is the most preventable cause of cancer death in the U.S, it accounts for one out of every three cancer deaths in California and costs state taxpayers more than $9 billion annually in health care costs because of smoking cigarettes-related illnesses.These statistics can drastically...
Smokers and cheap cigarette online users will no longer be hired at Providence Alaska Medical Center starting Nov. 17, according to hospital officials.When prospective hires apply they will take a drug and buy cigarette online test. If they fail, applicants can reapply in six months.The new policy does not affect current employees.All three major hospitals in Anchorage -- Providence, Alaska Regional Hospital and the Alaska Native Medical Center -- have smoke-free campuses, but Providence is the only one to take the policy a step further.Tammy Green, Providence's regional director of...
The common-law wife of a man who died of lung cancer has filed a civil lawsuit against the nation's largest cigarettes online company, accusing it of engaging in a deceptive advertising campaign designed to get people to smoke, including those in Alaska villages.In a complaint filed in Bethel Superior Court, Delores Hunter of Marshall accuses Philip Morris USA Inc. and its parent company, Altria Group Inc., of making and marketing discount cigarette online even though they knew the products were addictive and caused cancer.Hunter is the court-appointed personal representative of...
Calif. Senator Alex Padilla (D-Pacoima) announced today that Governor Jerry Brown has signed into law SB 332. This new law expands the availability of smoke-free housing in California by allowing landlords to prohibit smoking cigarettes in rental units. The law goes into effect on January 1, 2012.“With the Governor’s action today, we will see the availability of smoke-free, multi-family housing grow throughout California,” said Senator Padilla. “While more than 86% of Californians do not smoke, there is currently very little smoke-free housing in California. Living in multi-family...